Tag Archives: family court judges
June 7, 2022 District Court Truancy Diversion program seeking volunteer professionals to light the way for student success
The pandemic disrupted school attendance habits and the Truancy Diversion Program (TDP) goal is to help get students back on track. Attorneys, mental health professionals, law enforcement officers and other professionals are invited to step up as truancy diversion volunteer judges to bring up graduation rates in Clark County. TDP volunteers are asked to commit one morning each week to preside over a weekly session at an assigned Clark County School District (CCSD) or Charter school. Wearing a judicial robe, the TDP volunteer judge, an educational liaison and a family advocate meet with students and their families, if possible, to address each student’s attendance record, behavioral issues and barriers to regular school attendance. The volunteers along with the educational liaison, also facilitate solutions, and motivate students to attend class and complete assignments.
Those with additional questions or who want to volunteer, can contact the Truancy Diversion Program through email TDP@clarkcountycourts.us or call 702-455-1755.
The program is overseen by District Court Judge Margaret Pickard in collaboration with the CCSD. “Our Truancy Diversion Program volunteers motivate kids who may not otherwise have anyone else in their life to fill that role,” said Judge Pickard. “The volunteer judges have a tremendous positive influence and mentor young people struggling with school attendance towards a brighter future with promise. Having that kind of impact is incredibly rewarding.”
Skipping school, cutting, ditching, or as it is officially known – truancy, is considered by many as a gateway to dropping out of school and criminal activity. The Truancy Diversion Program (TDP) gets kids in school and on track to graduate, so they can take steps to achieve career success.
The TDP, administered by the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, was established by Judge Gerald Hardcastle in 2002. Volunteering for the Truancy Diversion Program is a rewarding way to make our community stronger through helping our youth achieve the skills they need to have successful careers. The volunteer judge imparts formality to the student meetings while also providing access to an approachable authority figure who helps to solve obstacles and motivate. The interaction between the TDP judge and family provides participants with enhanced social skills, a sense of empowerment, and an increased appreciation for the value of education.
A training session planned to give volunteer judges the tips and tools they need to motivate students to achieve. TDP volunteers must be at least 21 and able to pass a background check. The total time commitment is approximately 2.5 hours per week for the duration of the school year.
Tags: Clark County Courts, Clark County Graduation rates, Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court, family court judges, Judge Margaret Pickard, Las Vegas Court, Las Vegas courts, Las Vegas truancy prevention, Margaret Pickard, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Truancy prevention in Clark County, Truancy prevention in Las Vegas
June 13, 2013 Family Court Judges Focus Priorities On Children In Foster Care Judges Shoulder Heavier Caseloads And Utilize Technology As Part Of 12-Point Plan To Improve Efficiency For Cases Involving Abused And Neglected Children
The Family Court Judges are implementing a 12-point plan that will meet the Eighth Judicial District Court goal of achieving timely permanency for children in the foster care system. That plan includes taking one Judge who hears a domestic caseload and assigning that judge to an abuse and neglect caseload. Now three judges hear abuse and neglect calendars fulltime. The departments that handle domestic cases are shouldering an average six percent heavier caseload to provide dedicated judges for foster care cases.
Late last year, Chief Judge Jennifer P. Togliatti issued an administrative order which established a special committee to examine access to justice in the dependency court by looking at court rules, court case management, case assignment, whether case processing delays are related to hearing master resources and duties as defined in EDCR 1.46, timeliness of trials and hearings, judicial resources, statistics and their definitions, statutory timeliness, trial stacks and other related matters. After a three-month review of the court’s approach to permanency for children and their families, the committee submitted a comprehensive report with 12 recommendations. Most critical was the examination of case assignment and judicial resources. The committee exhaustively reviewed the number and types of hearings in 2012.
The committee sought input from community partners. Three main issues were identified: the lack of use of bench cards for consistency; barriers to notification of appointment of counsel; and the slow, outdated method of sharing discovery (which contributed to frequent requests for continuances). The committee took immediate action and addressed barriers to information sharing for dependency cases.
The caseload and case assignment of juvenile dependency matters were examined. The protective custody hearing was noted as an extremely important hearing. It was determined that protective custody hearings associated with foster care, should only be heard by the dependency judges and one hearing master should be assigned to one judge. The judge should assign certain hearings to their designated masters to facilitate the case management of the case.
Several case processing delays were identified, the two most prominent: appointment of counsel and delay in receiving discovery. Case processing was re-engineered to use automation whenever possible.
One of the critical issues facing this committee was the development of accurate statistics so they could make sound recommendations. The Eighth Judicial District Court Information Technology Division provided accurate, verifiable statistics. In addition, the IT division created a caseload report to assist in measuring statutory timelines. Scanners were installed in all the dependency courtrooms. Other new procedures were implemented including: preliminary protective hearing initiating process, case plan procedures, reasonable efforts procedures, and case initiation from petition procedures. These changes enable the tracking of timeliness. “The Family Court judges have unanimously agreed and rallied together to make this 12-point plan work to help children who need a stable, loving and permanent home, said Presiding Family Court Judge Gloria O’ Malley. “Streamlining case processing will improve outcomes for some of our community’s most vulnerable children and the case reassignment will enable the “one family – one judge” model for juvenile dependency cases.
“I would like to acknowledge the outstanding work accomplished by the committee chaired by Judge Arthur Ritchie and included Justice Nancy Saitta, Judge Charles Hoskin, Judge Frank Sullivan, Judge Robert Teuton, court executive officer Steve Grierson; assistant county manager Jeff Wells and the executive director of Legal Aid of Southern Nevada Barbara Buckley,” said Chief Judge Togliatti. “I would also like to acknowledge the cooperative spirit demonstrated by the Family Court Judges who worked together in order to make the needed case reassignment work.”
The foster care improvement demonstrates how the Eighth Judicial District Court is using technology and alternative, more efficient methods to improve the delivery of justice. District Court continuously works to develop innovative ideas, improve efficiencies, address issues and improve access to justice. For more information about the courts, please visit our website at clarkcountycourts.us.
Tags: abuse and neglect, eighth judicial district, Eighth Judicial District Court, family court judges, foster care system, judicial district court
eighthjdcourt 