July 8, 2021 New District Court fee payment now available Online

Fee payment for the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada is now available online. Payment can be made on the court website https://payments.clarkcountycourts.us/. Prompts guide users through the payment process using a Visa, MasterCard or e-check. There is a service fee of 2.6 percent for credit card payments.
Tags: Clark County court fee payment, Court fee payment, COVID-19 court response, Eighth Judicial District Court, Las Vegas Court, Las Vegas court fee payments, Las Vegas courts, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court
- Leave a comment
- Posted under COVID court response, COVID-19 Courts, Uncategorized
June 4, 2021 New Administrative Order 21-04 addresses all operations as court ramps up from slowdown caused by pandemic

New Administrative Order 21-04 continues the District Court’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. For purposes of clarity and to avoid confusion, this order supersedes AO 20-01 through 20-13, 20-16, 20-17, 20-22, 20-23, 20-24, and 21-03. Any portions of those orders that remain in effect are included in this order. AO 20-14 (the process for electronic processing of search warrants) remains in effect. Except where otherwise noted, this order takes effect upon filing.
Tags: Clark county Court Cases during coronavirus, Clark County Courts, Clark County Courts Coronavirus, COVID-19 court response, COVIDClarkCounty, Eighth Judicial District Court, Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada Administrative Order 21-04, EJDC AO 21-04, Judge Linda Bell, Judge Linda Marie Bell, Justice James Hardesty, Las Vegas, Las Vegas Court, Las Vegas court cases during coronavirus, Las Vegas courts, Las Vegas Courts Coronavirus, Las Vegas courts response to coronavirus, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Justice James Hardesty
April 14, 2021 Jury Duty Scam Resurfaces With Demands For Cash To Clear Warrants

Scammers are at it again, frightening their potential victims with jail time if they don’t pay up for missing jury duty. The scam callers sound official. They offer a police sergeant’s name, badge and phone number. They use real judges’ names to give their bogus stories credibility. This time the scammers claim the unsuspecting victim has outstanding warrants due to failure to appear for jury duty. They threaten victims that they need to pay-up or be criminally charged.
Similar scams have made the rounds in our community before. The schemes are attempted via telephone, mail or e-mail. They frequently ask victims to purchase pre-paid credit cards. They target vulnerable populations such as senior citizens.
“We want to get the word out to the community about this latest scam and ask everyone to warn friends and family. The court never solicits money on the telephone,” said District Court Chief Judge Linda Bell. “I encourage those who receive suspicious calls with demands for money to clear warrants to report them to law enforcement.”
The District Court website offers information on jury service at http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/ejdc/juror-information/index.html. Those who have received a summons can reschedule jury service online at https://ejuror.clarkcountycourts.us. A jury phone line is also available at 702-455-4472 (callers should remain on the line for the operator).
Tags: Clark County scams, Court scams, Judge Linda Bell, jury duty scams, jury scam, Las Vegas scams, Linda Bell, scams, Warrant scam
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Clark County Jury Scam, Court scams, Las Vegas Scams, Uncategorized
January 29, 2021 District Court to resume jury trials with extensive COVID-19 safety plan in place




The Eighth Judicial District Court (EJDC) of Nevada will resume jury trials Feb. 1 with an extensive plan in place that involves air purification, rapid testing, social distance measures throughout the process, plexiglass partitions and other precautions in place to keep jurors, judges, attorney and other trial participants socially distant and compliant with the Center for Disease Control guidelines. A live video stream of trials will be available on the court website home page http://www.clarkcountycourts.us. Jury trials have been suspended since March 14, after Governor Steve Sisolak declared a state of emergency in Nevada in response to outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19).
“District Court is committed to safely resuming jury trials in Clark County in order to fulfill the court’s responsibility of providing fair and timely administration of justice,” said Chief Judge Linda Bell. “We worked closely with several entities, including Clark County, University Medical Center (UMC), the State of Nevada’s Division of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and the Southern Nevada Health District (SNHD) to develop and implement a very comprehensive plan that enables the court to resume its in-person jury operation in a manner that protects those who participate in the jury trial process during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The EJDC plan is designed to conduct in-person jury trials by taking every reasonable precaution that has been recommended by community health care professionals including:
· The Jury Commissioner will mail a letter accompanying jury summonses advising all prospective jurors of the COVID-19 safety protocols contained in this plan. The letter will further include an advisement regarding the availability of a hardship deferral or excusal for COVID-19 related reasons. Prospective jurors who are experiencing symptoms, feeling sick, or have been exposed to COVID-19 will be advised to not report for jury duty. Prospective jurors who are considered high risk, such as persons 65 years of age or older, or persons with underlying medical conditions which place the person at risk will be eligible for a deferral.
· The Jury Commissioner will summons a reduced number of citizens to field a sufficient amount of jurors for a venire not to exceed 55 prospective jurors at any one time. Summons reporting trends will be monitored with adjustments made as needed.
· A new standard supplemental questionnaire will be added questionnaire will seek information to help shorten the jury selection process by allowing the court and counsel to pre-screen prospective jurors for issues related to undue hardship, extreme inconvenience, and overall fitness to serve. The supplemental questionnaire will include COVID-19 questions that will allow prospective jurors to reflect on whether they believe they can safely serve as a juror.
· All jurors, witnesses, and trial participants entering the courthouse will be required to wear a face covering at all times while in the building except when eating or drinking during breaks. Personal cloth face coverings and surgical masks will be allowed. If an individual does not have a face covering upon entry the marshals will provide one at no cost. Face coverings must fully cover the nose and the mouth and may not have vents. Additionally, while face shields are permissible, they must be worn in conjunction with a face covering.
· Before entering the jury room, each prospective juror will undergo a temperature check and answer the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) approved COVID-19 screening questions. Prospective jurors will be checked-in by jury services staff and then be seated on socially distanced chairs in the jury room. Appropriate facial coverings must be required to be worn continuously at all times. A maximum of 55 persons will be allowed in the jury room at one time. Hand sanitizer stations will be available for use by all trial participants throughout the jury room and courthouse, as will other PPE such as disposable masks, gloves, and cleaning supplies.
· District Court trials in the Regional Justice Center will only be conducted in re-configured courtrooms that are capable of accommodating six feet of social distancing between trial participants. Physical modifications will include removing barriers to create more open space. In areas where six feet of social distancing is not practical, such as the judge’s bench, witness stand, counsel tables, and court staff desks, Plexiglas physical dividers will be installed.
· Additional video monitors, microphones, and other forms of technology will be added to ensure trial participants can clearly see and hear the proceeding. If microphones are used, they will either be disinfected after each use, or the court will use disposable microphone covers.
Consistent with the recommendations from our health care partners, the court will work with Clark County Real Property Management to take additional measures including:
· Enhance the air quality and air disinfection within the courthouse.
· Enhance the environmental sanitation in the Regional Justice Center.
· Increasing porter services throughout the day to continuously disinfect high touch surfaces i.e. (elevator buttons, escalator handrails, restroom spaces, etc.), and providing individual antibacterial cleaning wipes for all trial participants to wipe high touch areas during breaks to increase frequency and surface cleaning.
· Enhance Regional Justice Center’s infection controls. This will include, replacing cloth chairs with cleanable material, adding hand sanitizer stations at all entrances with greater than 60 percent alcohol, adding plexiglass dividers, additional signage to encourage hand washing and symptoms review, and admonishment to jurors not to attend large gatherings during trial.
· Seated jurors will be provided the option to have a clear face shield to wear in addition to their masks for added protection. They will also receive a new, unused notepad and a new, unused pen. The jurors will leave the pen and pad at their seats during breaks/evenings.
· Defense counsel will be provided a headset system to have private, confidential communication with their client and maintain social distancing.
· Trial exhibits may only be submitted electronically, unless otherwise permitted by the trial judge. If paper or physical evidence is determined to be necessary, disposable gloves must be used by all trial participants.
· Judges will move to an alternative location where social distancing may be maintained and a record may be made for any discussions required outside the presence of the jury.
· Jury deliberation rooms in the courthouse will not be used at this time due to their limited size. Instead, jury deliberations will be conducted in the courtroom or an adjacent courtroom where jurors can be safely socially distanced.
· Juror meals provided by the court during trial will be individually prepared meals, rather than buffet style to reduce the risk of exposure.
· District Court IT will provide live streaming access to any open public trial proceeding. No in-person spectators will be permitted in the courtroom. At any time during trial, the judge may order live streaming to be turned to audio only should it be deemed necessary for the safety and security of a witness.
The EJDC and UMC have entered into a COVID-19 Testing Services Agreement. This agreement will provide onsite COVID-19 rapid testing to all trial participants, including jurors, attorneys, and court personnel, who are developing symptoms during a trial or to those who report a potential exposure and a corresponding action plan.
This is the direct link to the Eighth Judicial District Court (EJDC) of Nevada COVID-19 jury trial plan https://eighthjdcourt.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/ejdc-covid-19-jury-trial-plan_public.pdf
Tags: Clark County Jury Duty, COVID-19 jury trial plan, jury duty, jury service, Las Vegas Jury Duty, Linda Bell
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Clark County Courts Coronavirus, coronavirus, Coronavirus Administrative Orders, Coronavirus Clark County, Court Coronavirus response, Courts Coronavirus, COVID court response, COVID-19, COVID-19 closures Las Vegas, COVID-19 jury trial plan, COVID-19 Las Vegas Courts, COVID19 Nevada, jury duty Clark County, Jury duty Las Vegas, Nevada Coronavirus recovery plan, Nevada Court COVID-19, Nevada Courts Coronavirus, Nevada Courts Jury trials during coronavirus, Nevada courts response to Coronavirus, Uncategorized
November 24, 2020 District Court Administrative Order 20-24 requires parties to appear remotely, suspends in-person court business including trials, and implements other COVID-19 safety measures

District Court Administrative Order 20-24, effective November 24, 2020, continues the District Court’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and allows the business of the Court to go forward safely. Administrative Order 20-17 remains in effect, except as modified by this Administrative Order. This Administrative Order supersedes Administrative Orders 20-22 and 20-23, so that the operative orders for the District Court related to the pandemic are currently Administrative Order 20-17 and this Order, 20-24.
The court’s COVID-19 protocols can be found in AO 20-24 and AO 20-17. Highlights of the safety measures in AO-24 include:
1. All appearances through Jan. 11 must be by alternative means unless the assigned judge determines there is some extraordinary circumstances that require a personal appearance.
2. Jury trials are suspended until Jan. 11.
3. The Clerk’s Office will remain closed to in-person filing until Jan. 11.
4. An order that requires masks at all times in court facilities will remain in effect.
5. No in-person meetings are to be conducted.
6. Family Mediation Center will be handling mediations remotely and rescheduling child interviews and child/parent observations until after Jan. 11.
7. Donna’s House will remain open by appointment only, but will need to operate at 25 percent capacity or less.
8. Self-help centers are closed to in-person assistance. The Civil Legal Aid Self-Help Center can be reached at 702-671-3976 or flshcinfo@lacsn.org on Mondays through Thursdays, from 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. For assistance from the Family Law Self-Help Center call 702-455-1500 or visit slshcinfo@lacswww.FamilyLawSelfHelpCenter.orgn.org on Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.
9. Hearings on Jan. 4 and Jan 5 should be moved, except initial arraignment court, TPO, and dependency and delinquency matters to conduct move operations.
Appearances by Alternative Means Required
Effective November 25, 2020 through January 11, 2021, due to restrictions on entrants to the Court facilities and to reduce the potential for the spread of infection, appearances by alternative means are required by all lawyers and litigants, with the exception of in-custody defendants appearing in the Lower Level Arraignment Courtroom. This includes all case types. No in-person appearances shall be made by lawyers or litigants unless the assigned District Court Judge or Hearing Master determines that there is an extraordinary circumstance requiring a personal appearance.
Video appearance is strongly preferred over other methods of appearance by alternative means, and required in criminal, dependency, and delinquency cases unless prevented by technological issues. Lawyers representing indigent clients are urged to provide assistance to clients who do not have the independent ability to appear by alternative means.
Attorneys, parties, and witnesses are reminded that alternative means still constitutes a court appearance and attire should remain professional and court appropriate. Also, for the safety of the community and for the quality of the audio recording, no appearances by alternative means should be made while driving.
Mandatory Face Coverings Required at All Times
In keeping with the Governor’s announcement and the policy of Clark County, all District Court judges and employees are required to wear face coverings at all times while in the workplace except while eating or drinking during breaks. This includes all areas of court facilities, including parking lots. Face coverings must cover the nose and mouth at all times. Face coverings must comply with CDC guidelines and coverings with vents or made out of mesh are not permitted. Face shields may be worn with a mask as added protection, but may not be worn alone.
This Administrative Order modifies the mandatory face covering provisions found in AO 20-17. Administrative Order 20-17 previously allowed district court employees to not wear a face covering if they worked alone in an unshared workspace.
The provisions of Administrative Order 20-17 requiring all attorneys, vendors and employees of any organization or entity who work in a Court facility to wear face coverings at all times while in any common areas of the facility remain in effect. Common areas include, but are not limited to, security screening, lobby areas, public elevators, employee elevators, shared back hallways, public restrooms, and courtrooms.
In-Person Meetings Suspended Until January 11, 2021
Until January 11, 2021, outside of individual departments, no in-person gatherings or meetings may be held to discuss court business. Meetings include, but are not limited to: judges meetings; executive committee meetings; bench-bar meetings; any meetings with community partners; specialty court staffing; specialty court graduations; administrative department meetings; continuing education meetings; and meetings of any judges and/or hearing masters within a particular case assignment. Meetings should go forward, but must be conducted by telephone, teleconference, videoconference, or other alternative means.
Clerk’s Office Remains Closed to In-Person Filing
For the safety of the clerks and to minimize building traffic, the District Court Clerk’s Offices at both the Regional Justice Center and the Family Court remain closed for in-person filings until further notice.
Filings must be completed electronically. For self-represented litigants who do not have the ability to electronically file documents, documents may be mailed as follows:
District Court Civil/Criminal Division Attn: Clerk’s Office Regional Justice Center, 200 Lewis Ave. Las Vegas, NV 89155
District Court Family Division Attn: Clerk’s Office, Family Court 601 N. Pecos Rd. Las Vegas, NV 89155
The Clerk’s Office shall maintain a safety protocol for clerks tasked with opening mail and handling paper documents. Other than mail, no paper documents will be accepted by the Court. Call (702) 455-4472 with questions regarding filing.
Depositions
No in-person depositions shall proceed prior to January 11, 2021 unless the parties and witness agree for the deposition to go forward in-person or by order of the court obtained after filing a motion demonstrating an extraordinary circumstance warranting the need for an in-person deposition.
Hearings and Bench Trials
Hearings of all sorts, including evidentiary hearings, in all case types should proceed through use of alternative means.
Bench trials in all case types should go forward as outlined in AO 20-17 as long as the trial may be accomplished by the use of alternative means. Appearances by witnesses, parties, and lawyers must be by alternative means unless the District Court Judge finds that (1) a personal appearance by an individual is necessary to conduct the proceeding and (2) extraordinary circumstances require the proceeding to go forward at this time.
Formatting of Electronic Signature Block for Proposed Orders
Proposed orders sent to a department’s inbox as outlined in AO 20-17 need only include a blank line for the judge’s signature, e.g. _____________________. Orders do not need a date, judge’s name, or judge’s title. Sufficient space should be allowed above and below the signature line for the judge’s signature and the electronic stamp including date, title, and name of the judge.
Jury Trials Suspended Until January 11, 2021
By way of AO 20-23, jury trials currently scheduled to begin prior to November 30, 2020, were continued. All District Court jury trials, including short jury trials, remain continued through January 11, 2021.
Once trials resume, the District Court’s COVID-19 Jury Trial Plan for safely resuming trials will remain in effect.
January 4 and 5, 2021 Matters Continued
The District Court is facing a massive case reassignment to accommodate twenty-two new judges beginning on January 4. As a result, no hearings will be scheduled for January 4 or January 5, 2021 other than criminal arraignment court, TPO, child dependency or delinquency, or matters deemed to be an emergency by the assigned judge. Any hearings currently set on those days must be rescheduled.
CIVIL MATTERS
Subpoenas
Attorneys no longer must obtain advance approval from the discovery commissioner to issue subpoenas under NRCP 45. The subpoena provision found in AO 20-17 is rescinded. Attorneys are reminded to notice and provide a copy of the subpoena to other parties before service under NRCP 45(a)(4)(A). The District Court expects attorneys to cooperate when there are difficulties in obtaining documents due to issues arising from COVID-19.
CRIMINAL MATTERS
Grand Jury Proceeding Suspended Until January 11, 2021
The three currently existing grand juries will remain and are not excused. To complete presentments in process, the grand juries will meet the week of November 30, 2020. Grand jury proceedings are suspended from December 7, 2020 until January 11, 2021.
DOMESTIC MATTERS
Family Mediation Center
The Family Mediation Center will discontinue in-person mediations and provide mediation services via telephone or other alternative means until January 11, 2020. All child interviews and parent-child observations will be continued until after January 11, 2020.
Donna’s House
Donna’s House may continue providing supervised visitation, supervised custody exchanges and other in-person services by appointment only. Donna’s House must continue to follow protocols in place to ensure the health and safety of staff and patrons, including ensuring occupancy does not exceed twenty-five percent of capacity.
Court Appointed Special Advocate Program
Through January 11, 2021, CASA must hold all trainings, orientations, and other meetings by telephone or through alternative means.
COURT FACILITIES
Regional Justice Center
The District Court maintains responsibility for security in the RJC. In that regard, the District Court has serious concerns about the health and safety of people entering the building, particularly in regard to the number of people entering the building during morning hours. Our co-tenants are strongly encouraged to consider alternatives to reduce the number of people entering the building including allowing/requiring appearances by alternative means, expanding court times/days, continuing non-essential cases, having employees work from home where possible, or any other means that may reduce building numbers. The District Court remains willing to assist however possible in these efforts.
Self-Help Centers
The Family Law Self-Help Center located at Family Court and the Civil Law Self-Help Center located at the Regional Justice Center will stop providing in-person services to the public. All services will be provided via telephone, email, and other alternative means.
The Civil Law Self Help Center can be reached via e-mail at clshcinfo@lascn.org and via telephone at (702) 671-3976.
The Family Law Self-Help Center can be reached via e-mail at flshcinfo@lacsn.org and via telephone at (702) 455-1500 or (702) 386-1070.
FINAL PROVISIONS
Except where otherwise noted, this order will be reviewed every 30 days and remain in effect until modified or rescinded by a subsequent order.
View Administrative Order 20-24
Tags: Clark county Court Cases during coronavirus, Clark County Courts Coronavirus, coronavirus, Court Coronavirus response, Courts Coronavirus, Las Vegas Cornonavirus, Las Vegas court cases during coronavirus, Las Vegas Courts Coronavirus, Nevada Court, Nevada Court Administrative Orders, Nevada Court COVID-19, Nevada courts, Nevada Courts Coronavirus, Nevada courts response to Coronavirus, Nevada COVID-19, Nevada District Court Administrative Order 20-24, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court
- 2 comments
- Posted under Clark County Courts Coronavirus, coronavirus, Coronavirus Administrative Orders, Coronavirus Clark County, Coronavirus Nevada, Court Coronavirus response, Courts Coronavirus, Nevada Coronavirus recovery plan, Nevada Courts Coronavirus, Nevada Courts Jury trials during coronavirus, Nevada courts response to Coronavirus, Uncategorized
November 13, 2020 New District Court Administrative Order continues court COVID-19 safety response

On November 11, 2020, Governor Sisolak announced an alarming increase in new COVID-19 cases in Nevada. The Governor requested all individuals to stay in as much as possible, and to wear face coverings at all times.
Today, District Court Chief Judge Linda Bell issued Administrative Order 20-23 that continues the District Court’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic and allows the business of the Court to go forward safely. As a result of the Governor’s announcement, Clark County now requires employees to wear face coverings at all times while at work, even when the employee is in a personal workspace or office.
Mandatory Face Coverings Are Required at All Times
In keeping with the Governor’s announcement and the policy of Clark County, all District Court judges and employees are required to wear face coverings at all times while in the workplace except while eating or drinking during breaks. This includes all areas of court facilities, including parking lots. Face coverings must cover the nose and mouth at all times. Face coverings with vents or made out of mesh are not permitted. Face shields may be worn with a mask as added protection, but may not be worn alone.
This Administrative Order modifies the mandatory face covering provisions found in AO 20-17. Administrative Order 20-17 previously allowed district court employees to not wear a face covering if they worked alone in an unshared workspace.
The provisions of Administrative Order 20-17 requiring all attorneys, vendors and employees of any organization or entity who work in a Court facility to wear face coverings at all times while in any common areas of the facility remain in effect. Common areas include, but are not limited to, security screening, lobby areas, public elevators, employee elevators, shared back hallways, public restrooms, and courtrooms.
Rescheduling Jury Trials
All jury trials currently scheduled to begin prior to November 30, 2020, will be continued. Jury trials currently in progress should continue to the conclusion of the trial.
Clerk’s Office Is Closed to In-Person Filing
Effective immediately, for the safety of the clerks and to minimize building traffic, the District Court Clerk’s Offices at both the Regional Justice Center and the Family Court will be closed for in-person filings until November 30, 2020. Filings must be completed electronically. For litigants who do not have the ability to electronically file documents, documents may be mailed as follows:
District Court Civil/Criminal Division
Attn: Clerk’s Office
Regional Justice Center
200 Lewis Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89155
District Court Family Division
Attn: Clerk’s Office
Family Court
601 N. Pecos Rd.
Las Vegas, NV 89155
This Administrative Order temporarily modifies the relevant provisions found in AO 20-22, where the District Court re-opened the Clerk’s Office in a limited capacity.
Meetings
Effective immediately and until November 30, 2020, there shall be no in-person gatherings of meetings outside of individual judicial departments to discuss Court business.
Final Provisions
Except where otherwise noted, this order will be reviewed every 30 days and remain in effect until modified or rescinded by a subsequent order.
Read the full order here:
Tags: Administrative Order 20-23, Court Coronavirus response, EJDC Administrative Order 20-23, Judge Linda Bell, Nevada Coronavirus court orders, Nevada Courts Coronavirus, Nevada courts response to Coronavirus, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court Chief Judge Linda Bell issued Administrative Order 20-09 to manage civil matters During the COVID-19 pandemic
June 8, 2022 Local Superstar Selected From 93,000 CASA Volunteers Nationally To Take Home Prestigious National CASA/GAL 2022 Child Advocate Of The Year Award

Out of 49 states, 950 programs and more than 93,000 volunteers nationwide, local Eighth Judicial District Court superstar CASA volunteer Carolyn Muscari brings home to Las Vegas the prestigious National CASA/GAL Association’s 2022 G.F. Bettineski Child Advocate of the Year Award.
“For a very special award celebrating the heart of the CASA/Gal network a volunteer advocate. This year’s volunteer has served children in Las Vegas for 40 – for 40 – for 40 and a half years! This is the 40th anniversary of CASA/Gal nationally. So, she’s been serving as long as the organization has been actively serving children and families,” said Judge Anthony Capizzi, when presenting the award on behalf of the National CASA/Gal program.
“When I became a CASA Volunteer in September of 1981, I was motivated by Michael Lee that the only important thing in the world is people, and the most vulnerable people are children. One day I heard about CASA on the radio; and I immediately knew that was my calling, so I signed up. And as I’ve seen the difference a CASA volunteer can make in a child’s life over the last 40 years, I am committed to being a CASA volunteer for the rest of my life,” said Carolyn Muscari. “Saving even one child is better than none.” Her insight inspired a room full of people committed to serving the best interests of abused and neglected children. “One day, I had an awakening and realized that a lot of people feel bad for these children; and they don’t need me to just feel bad for them, they need me to help them.”
In a letter of support for Carolyn’s nomination, Judge Frank Sullivan wrote, “It is my sincere pleasure and honor to submit this letter in support of Carolyn Muscari’s nomination for the 2022 Child Advocate of the Year. In my 23 years of judicial experience, more than 18 of those years exclusively presiding over cases involving abused and neglected children, I can honestly state that I’ve never had an individual contribute more to promoting the best interests of children than Ms. Muscari. As such, I can’t imagine anyone who could be more deserving of this most prestigious award than Ms. Muscari. Not only does Ms. Muscari give every child a voice, she ensures that each child’s voice is heard loud and clear.” Judge Sullivan also noted her candor, “She is not hesitant to pulse and respectfully question the court to ensure that every child achieves a safe, loving, nurturing and permanent home in a timely manner. Suffice is to say, Ms. Muscari makes sure that every child’s voice is heard in a meaningful manner as that voice gives them hope for a safe and loving future.”
Carolyn, advocacy has changed the lives of more than 160 children as a CASA volunteer since August 1981. She tirelessly promotes the mission of CASA as a volunteer peer coordinator, interview panels, swearing in ceremonies and with the CASA program speakers’ bureau to help recruit more CASA volunteers. Carolyn’s longest case lasted nine years and she was the only constant person on the case.
“We are incredibly proud to have our District Court CASA program volunteer Carolyn Muscari selected for this prestigious award,” said District Court Chief Judge Linda Marie Bell. “During her 40 years of advocacy, she has had a tremendous positive impact on the lives of so many children. She also inspires others and strengthens the CASA program through her work as a peer coordinator and efforts to bring in new volunteers.”
The CASA program, which is part of the Family Division of the Eighth Judicial District Court, recruits, screens, trains and supports volunteers to represent the best interests of foster children in Clark County. The advocates represent the children in school, child and family team meetings and in court.
“Carolyn is truly Nevada’s treasure, a heroine of four decades to the children who need to be heard by those deciding their best interests,” said Presiding Family Court Judge Rebecca Burton. “With great admiration, we offer congratulations to Carolyn!”
For more information about the CASA program call 702-455-CASA, or visit www.casalasvegas.org.
Tags: Carolyn Muscari, CASA program Las Vegas, CASA volunteer, CASA; Las Vegas; Family Court; kids; Foster kids;, Judge Anthony Capizzi, Judge Anthony Capizzi Montgomery County Court in Ohio, Judge Bell, Judge Frank Sullivan, Judge Linda Marie Bell, Judge Rebecca Burton, Montgomery County Court in Ohio, National CASA/GAL Association’s 2022 G.F. Bettineski Child Advocate of the Year Award, Rebecca Burton, Volunteer in Las Vegas
- Leave a comment
- Posted under CASA, CASA Clark County, CASA Las Vegas, Kids, Uncategorized, volunteer
June 7, 2022 District Court Administrative Order 22-09 outlines case reassignments

District Court Chief Judge Linda Marie Bell issued Administrative Order 22-09 that outlines changes made to case assignments in juvenile delinquency and dependency, and changes in assignments in the civil/criminal division.
View/download Administrative Order 22-09
Tags: Administrative Order 22 - 09, Clark County court case reassignment, Eighth Judicial District Court, EJDC case reassignment, Judge Linda Bell, Las Vegas Court, Las vegas court case Reassignment, Las Vegas courts, Linda Marie Bell, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court Case reassignment
June 7, 2022 District Court Truancy Diversion program seeking volunteer professionals to light the way for student success

The pandemic disrupted school attendance habits and the Truancy Diversion Program (TDP) goal is to help get students back on track. Attorneys, mental health professionals, law enforcement officers and other professionals are invited to step up as truancy diversion volunteer judges to bring up graduation rates in Clark County. TDP volunteers are asked to commit one morning each week to preside over a weekly session at an assigned Clark County School District (CCSD) or Charter school. Wearing a judicial robe, the TDP volunteer judge, an educational liaison and a family advocate meet with students and their families, if possible, to address each student’s attendance record, behavioral issues and barriers to regular school attendance. The volunteers along with the educational liaison, also facilitate solutions, and motivate students to attend class and complete assignments.
Those with additional questions or who want to volunteer, can contact the Truancy Diversion Program through email TDP@clarkcountycourts.us or call 702-455-1755.
The program is overseen by District Court Judge Margaret Pickard in collaboration with the CCSD. “Our Truancy Diversion Program volunteers motivate kids who may not otherwise have anyone else in their life to fill that role,” said Judge Pickard. “The volunteer judges have a tremendous positive influence and mentor young people struggling with school attendance towards a brighter future with promise. Having that kind of impact is incredibly rewarding.”
Skipping school, cutting, ditching, or as it is officially known – truancy, is considered by many as a gateway to dropping out of school and criminal activity. The Truancy Diversion Program (TDP) gets kids in school and on track to graduate, so they can take steps to achieve career success.
The TDP, administered by the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, was established by Judge Gerald Hardcastle in 2002. Volunteering for the Truancy Diversion Program is a rewarding way to make our community stronger through helping our youth achieve the skills they need to have successful careers. The volunteer judge imparts formality to the student meetings while also providing access to an approachable authority figure who helps to solve obstacles and motivate. The interaction between the TDP judge and family provides participants with enhanced social skills, a sense of empowerment, and an increased appreciation for the value of education.
A training session planned to give volunteer judges the tips and tools they need to motivate students to achieve. TDP volunteers must be at least 21 and able to pass a background check. The total time commitment is approximately 2.5 hours per week for the duration of the school year.
Tags: Clark County Courts, Clark County Graduation rates, Eighth Judicial District Court, Family Court, family court judges, Judge Margaret Pickard, Las Vegas Court, Las Vegas courts, Las Vegas truancy prevention, Margaret Pickard, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Truancy prevention in Clark County, Truancy prevention in Las Vegas
May 17, 2022 Local 40-Year CASA Volunteer Selected As National CASA/GAL Association’s 2022 G.F. Bettineski Child Advocate of the Year Award

She calls herself a “CASA for life;” that’s one of the reasons local CASA Volunteer Carolyn Muscari was selected for the prestigious National CASA/GAL Association’s 2022 G.F. Bettineski Child Advocate of the Year Award. The announcement came in a letter to Carolyn that states: “The CASA/GAL movement is only possible through committed volunteer advocates like you, and we are pleased to recognize your commitment and dedication.”
The 40-year CASA volunteer will be presented with the award at the National CASA/GAL Awards of Excellence ceremony during the National CASA/GAL Association’s 40th anniversary conference. In addition, a $20,000 grant award will be provided to Eighth Judicial District Court-CASA Program for program-wide professional development for the benefit of all staff and volunteers of the program.
“We are incredibly proud to have our District Court CASA program volunteer Carolyn Muscari selected for this prestigious award,” said District Court Chief Judge Linda Marie Bell. “During her 40 years of advocacy, she has had a tremendous positive impact on the lives of so many children. She also inspires others and strengthens the CASA program through her work as a peer coordinator and efforts to bring in new volunteers.”
The CASA program, which is part of the Family Division of the Eighth Judicial District Court, recruits, screens, trains and supports volunteers to represent the best interests of foster children in Clark County. The advocates represent the children in school, child and family team meetings, and in court.
“Carolyn is truly Nevada’s treasure, a heroine of four decades to the children who need to be heard by those deciding their best interests,” said Presiding Family Court Judge Rebecca Burton. “With great admiration, we offer congratulations to Carolyn!”
“The National CASA/GAL Association for Children is celebrating its 40 Year Anniversary and I can’t think of a more appropriate way to celebrate than with the recognition of our own Carolyn Muscari as the National CASA/GAL Volunteer of the Year,” said Family Court Judge Frank Sullivan, who presides over the CASA program. “National CASA/GAL has over 93,000 dedicated volunteers and none more deserving of the Volunteer of the Year Award than Carolyn, who has served as a Clark County CASA for over 40 years. Over the past 40 years, Carolyn has improved the well-being of countless children in the Child Welfare System by helping them reach permanent homes through her tireless “best-interest” advocacy on their behalf. As promoted in the CASA/GAL National Campaign to Change a Child’s Story, Carolyn has truly changed her CASA children’s stories by making a life-changing difference in each child’s life by providing brighter futures for them, which in turn, has made our Clark County community stronger. Carolyn is the epitome of what a CASA is and what a CASA should be, and I’m truly professionally and personally honored and privileged to have served with Carolyn in her capacity as a CASA for over the past 20 years. Congratulations Carolyn on your well-deserved “40 on 40” recognition as National CASA/GAL Volunteer of the Year!”
For more information about the CASA program call 702-455-CASA, or visit www.casalasvegas.org.
Tags: Carolyn Muscari, CASA ClarkCounty, CASA Las Vegas, CASA volunteer, CASA; Las Vegas; Family Court; kids; Foster kids;, Frank Sullivan, Judge Frank Sullivan, Judge Linda Marie Bell, Judge Rebecca Burton, Linda Marie Bell, National CASA/GAL Association’s 2022 G.F. Bettineski Child Advocate of the Year Award, Rebecca Burton, Volunteer Las Vegas
- Leave a comment
- Posted under CASA, CASA Clark County, CASA Las Vegas, Uncategorized
May 13, 2022 Judge William Voy announces his retirement after 24 years serving in the Family Division of District Court

Judge William Voy has committed his career to serving the youth of Clark County. He was appointed by the governor of the State of Nevada to the Eighth Judicial District Court in 1998. For the first five years, Judge Voy heard domestic matters related primarily to divorce, custody and child-support. He also presided over the Adult Mental Health Civil Commitment Court. In 2003, he was selected to preside over the juvenile delinquency court. His communications style and life-experiences made the assignment a perfect fit. In 2005, Judge Voy established the nation’s first specialty court for sexually exploited youth. In addition, he implemented the state’s first juvenile diversion court and mental health court, as well as oversaw the implementation of Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) that reduced average daily population in detention by 50 percent. As a result, Judge Voy developed the first Probation 24/7 Intensive Supervision Unit in the country.
Judge Voy has been a key figure in Keeping Kids in School Summits hosted by the Eighth Judicial District Court, the Nevada State Public Charter School Authority and the Clark County School District. The summits have been held over many years to bring those involved in education, justice and youth services together to cover techniques to improve student success and graduation rates. Judge William Voy also oversaw the Truancy Diversion Program (TDP) an effective, non-punitive, incentive-based approach to re-engage at-risk students with truancy problems to prevent and reduce youth crime.
“Judge Voy has dedicated many years to turning the lives around of youth facing the justice system in our community,” said District Court Chief Judge Linda Marie Bell. “We wish Judge Voy well in all his future endeavors.” In a letter to the governor and chief justice of the Nevada Supreme Court announcing his retirement, Judge Voy wrote, “For the last twenty-four years, it has been my great privilege and honor to serve the families and citizens of Clark County and the State of Nevada. I look forward to being able to continue to serve the families and citizens of Nevada in the future.” His retirement is effective May 31 of this year.
“Striving to find good in the youth who appeared before him, Judge Voy has been an innovative leader in creating programs to provide structure and help, rather than punishment, where appropriate to guide children to better choices and a better life. Judge Voy will be greatly missed by his colleagues, community partners and the families he has assisted,” said Presiding Family Division Judge Rebecca Burton. “As the judicial officer who married my husband and I, Judge Voy holds an extra special place in my heart.”
Prior to being appointed to the District Court bench, Judge Voy spent 10 years in private practice in Las Vegas and also served as a captain in the U.S. Army’s Judge Advocate General’s Office, stationed at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. Judge Voy received his law degree from Willamette University in Salem Oregon in 1986.
Tags: Clark County Courts, Eighth Judicial District Court, Judge William Voy, juvenile justice in Las Vegas, Las Vegas Court, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court, Truancy Diversion Program Clark County, truancy prevention, William Voy
May 10, 2022 New District Court Administrative Order 22-08 Covers Deposition Behavior

New District Court Administrative Order 22-08 gives attorneys clear information on Deposition Behavior: http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/general/court-rules-and-administrative-orders/#Administrative%20Orders
The 23-page Order also includes information on what is not acceptable in Discovery including gamesmanship: “There is no room for gamesmanship in the discovery process. It is antithetical to the purpose of discovery and unethical. Manipulation of the discovery rules frustrates the entire process, “because one of ‘[t]he purpose[s] of discovery is to remove surprise from trial preparation so the parties can obtain evidence necessary to evaluate and resolve their dispute.”
Attorneys should read the entire administrative order to be ready to ace disposition behavior http://www.clarkcountycourts.us/general/court-rules-and-administrative-orders/#Administrative%20Orders
Tags: Administrative Order 22-08, EJDC AO 22-08, Judge Linda Bell, Judge Linda Marie Bell, New Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada Administrative Orders
May 2, 2022 District Court Administrative Order 22-07 updates court operations related to COVID 19

New Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada Administrative Order 22-07 updates court operations related to COVID 19. The Oder is posted on the court website:
Court Rules and Administrative Orders
Tags: Administrative Order 22-07, Court Coronavirus response, Court response to COVID-19, Judge Linda Bell
April 15, 2022 Amendments to rules of practice coming to the Eighth

ADKT 0590 and 0591 amend the rules of practice in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada.
The Supreme Court of Nevada issued ADKT 0590 on April 11, 2022. It amends the Eighth Judicial District Court rules on organization of the court and court administration, Family Division matters and guardianship.
ADKT 0591 amends the Eighth Judicial District court rules regarding criminal practice and general provisions.
Below is Supreme Court of Nevada Order 0591.

Tags: Eighth Judicial District Court, Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada, Nevada courts, Nevada legal education, Nevada supreme court orders, Rules of practice
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
April 15, 2022 Applications being accepted for judicial seat in District Court Department IX

Applications are being accepted for judicial seat in department IX of the District Court, after Governor Steve Sisolak officially declared the vacancy. The seat in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Nevada became available after the United States Senate approved the appointment of Jurist Cristina D. Silva to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada on March 23.
The Commission on Judicial Selection is now accepting applications for the open seat https://nvcourts.gov/AOC/Templates/documents.aspx?folderID=8938. The commission will review the applications and conduct interviews, before recommending three applicants to Governor Sisolak, who will make the appointment.
Since the judicial vacancy was announced after the March 18, 2022 filing deadline for the November 8, 2022 general election, NRS 293.165(2) applies. Therefore, to continue serving in the Eighth Judicial District Court, department IX, the successful appointee must file as a candidate for the next proceeding general election.
According to the Nevada Supreme Court website, the deadline for applicants to request FTP server access and background check paperwork from the Administrative Office of the Court is May 2, 2022 at noon. The application deadline is May 9, 2022 at noon. Applicant interviews are scheduled to be conducted June 9 and 10, according to the Nevada Supreme Court website.
For more information on the application process or to apply visit https://nvcourts.gov/AOC/Templates/documents.aspx?folderID=8938.
Tags: Clark County Courts, Cristina D. Silva, department IX, Eighth Judicial District Court, judicial openings in Nevada, judicial seat, Las Vegas Court, Las Vegas courts, Nevada Court, Nevada Eighth Judicial District Court
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Uncategorized
April 13, 2022 Tonight 23 new CASA Volunteers to swear oath in a live ceremony to speak for best interests of abused and neglected children

A diverse cross-section of 23 newly trained Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) volunteers will be sworn in Tonight April 13 at 6 p.m. at the Clark County Government Center, ODC 3 to advocate for the best interests for 59 children in foster care. It is the first in-person oath ceremony since the pandemic ad it fall on the final night of a five-week training program. Judge Frank Sullivan will swear in a married couple, CCSD staff, UNLV students, moms, City of Henderson staff, non-profit founder/director, realtors and casino employees . The CASA Program needs more volunteers to meet the goal of 1,000 volunteers to meet the advocacy needs of abused and neglected children in Clark County. Those interested can learn more at one of the many monthly online orientations. Potential volunteers for the CASA program can call 702-455-4306 or visit www.casalasvegas.org to sign up for one of the upcoming online orientations.
· Wednesday, Apr. 20 (6 – 7 p.m.)
· Friday, Apr. 22 (noon – 1 p.m.)
· Wednesday, May 4 (noon – 1 p.m.)
· Friday, May 13 (9 a.m. – 10 a.m.)
· Wednesday, May 18 (6 – 7 p.m.)
· Friday, May 27 (noon – 1 p.m.)
The CASA program, which is part of the Family Division of the Eighth Judicial District Court, recruits, screens, trains and supports volunteers to represent the best interests of foster children in Clark County. The advocates represent the children in school, child and family team meetings, and in court. Volunteering for the program involves a two-year commitment and a willingness to spend quality time with the children to advocate for them. In 1980, Judge John Mendoza led the creation of the CASA Program in Clark County.
“When you give abused and neglected kids a CASA, you give them a voice. When you give them a voice, you give them hope. When you give them hope, you give them a future,” said Family Court Judge Frank Sullivan, who presides over the program. “CASA’s are the eyes and ears for the court. They provide a voice and offer stability for kids who are in foster care and don’t otherwise have a lot of stability in their lives.”
“Everyday, CASA volunteers are advocating for and changing the stories of abused and neglected children,” said Presiding Family Court Judge Rebecca Burton “We invite those who really want to make a difference in our community to visit casalasvegas.org to learn more and sign up for one of the online orientations.”
The ceremony will be live-streamed at https://www.facebook.com/CASALasVegas at 6 p.m.
- Leave a comment
- Posted under CASA, CASA Clark County, CASA Las Vegas, Uncategorized